What is the correct order of steps for testing and debugging a workflow?

The correct order of steps for testing and debugging a workflow starts with validation, followed by running the workflow, and then adding breakpoints before proceeding to debug.

Beginning with validation is essential as it checks for any syntactical errors or logical inconsistencies in your workflow before execution. This ensures that the workflow is operationally sound, minimizing the chances of running into obvious issues during runtime.

Once the validation is successfully completed, running the workflow allows you to observe its behavior and output in a practical setting. This step provides immediate feedback on how the workflow functions in real-time, facilitating the identification of any unexpected behavior.

After running the workflow, adding breakpoints is an important step. Breakpoints allow you to pause execution at specific points in the workflow. This is crucial for thorough analysis where you can inspect the values of variables, the state of the application, or any other conditions at particular steps.

Finally, debugging the workflow is where you systematically go through the execution with the ability to pause, resume, and examine your workflow's behavior in detail, pinpointing the cause of any issues.

This sequence helps create a robust workflow testing environment, ensuring that errors are caught early while also providing the necessary visibility and control during the debugging process.